Sixth Among Such Wisdom — Inferno, Canto 4

Inferno · Canto 4 · Lines 64–105 · Scene 12

Dante and Virgil keep walking through the crowded, sighing fog of Limbo, and after a while Dante notices something new: a fire up ahead, glowing so brightly it pushes back an entire dome of darkness around itself. As they get closer, he can tell the fire belongs to some kind of honored group — the people around it clearly aren’t like the anonymous crowds sighing all around them. Dante asks who these separated, honored souls are, and Virgil explains: their fame on earth earned them special favor here. Then a voice calls out from the group: ‘Honor the loftiest poet — his shade is returning, the one that had left us.’ That’s Virgil himself being welcomed back, because he had left Limbo earlier in the story to go fetch Dante. Once the voice stops, four huge shades come forward to meet them, and their faces show neither sadness nor joy — just a kind of settled dignity. Virgil names them one by one: Homer, carrying a sword, walking in front of the other three like their leader; then Horace, then Ovid, then Lucan last. Virgil explains why they’re greeting him so warmly: they all share the same title he does — poet — the word the voice called out — so honoring him is honoring what they all are together. Dante watches this whole reunion happen, calls it ‘the beautiful school’ gathered around Homer, ‘the lord of the highest song, who flies above the rest like an eagle.’ Then something remarkable happens almost as an afterthought. After talking a while longer, the four poets turn to Dante and give him a friendly nod of greeting. Virgil smiles at this. And then, with no test, no demonstration, no proof of anything Dante has ever written, they simply make him one of their group: sixth, among that much genius. Dante doesn’t explain why they let him in. He just tells us it happened.

64. Non lasciavam l’andar perch’ei dicessi,65. ma passavam la selva tuttavia,66. la selva, dico, di spiriti spessi.

translation note: Line 66 — ‘la selva, dico, di spiriti spessi’ — the wood, I say, thick with spirits. The repetition of ‘selva’ recalls the poem’s opening wood (Inf. I.2) while redefining it: Limbo is now pictured as a forest not of trees but of densely packed souls. [Model knowledge · medium]

67. Non era lunga ancor la nostra via68. di qua dal sonno, quand’io vidi un foco69. ch’emisperio di tenebre vincia.

literary key: Line 69 — ‘ch’emisperio di tenebre vincia’ — that overcame a hemisphere of darkness. The first light of any kind since the pilgrim entered Hell, and it is described in terms of conquest — ‘vincia’ (overcame) — framing illumination itself as a victory over the surrounding dark rather than a neutral visual fact. [Model knowledge · high]

vocabulary: Line 68 — ‘di qua dal sonno’ — this side of the sleep. Dante measures the distance traveled against his own unexplained crossing of the Acheron (Canto IV’s opening scene), continuing to use the sleep as the poem’s reference point for time and distance in a place where neither functions normally. [Model knowledge · low]

70. Di lungi n’eravamo ancora un poco,71. ma non sì ch’io non discernessi in parte72. ch’orrevol gente possedea quel loco.

vocabulary: Line 72 — ‘orrevol gente’ — honored, worthy people. Before any figure is named, Dante can already tell from a distance that this group is categorically distinct from the anonymous ‘turbe… molte e grandi’ of the wider circle (IV.30). [Model knowledge · medium]

73. «O tu ch’onori scïenzïa e arte,74. questi chi son c’hanno cotanta onranza,75. che dal modo de li altri li diparte?».

literary key: Line 73 — ‘O tu ch’onori scïenzïa e arte’ — o you who honor knowledge and art. Dante’s address to Virgil names the two things Virgil is credited with honoring, framing the coming introduction as a matter of learning and craft rather than piety or moral standing. [Model knowledge · low]

76. E quelli a me: «L’onrata nominanza77. che di lor suona sù ne la tua vita,78. grazïa acquista in ciel che sì li avanza».

theology: Line 78 — ‘grazïa acquista in ciel che sì li avanza’ — earns them grace in Heaven that so advances them. A striking claim inside a circle whose defining doctrine, stated one scene earlier, is that no merit earns salvation here (IV.34–42, 63); the poem does not reconcile the tension between literary fame as advantage and Limbo’s flat denial of blessedness. [Model knowledge · medium]

79. Intanto voce fu per me udita:80. «Onorate l’altissimo poeta;81. l’ombra sua torna, ch’era dipartita».

literary key: Line 81 — ‘l’ombra sua torna, ch’era dipartita’ — his shade returns, which had departed. The consensus reading identifies ‘l’altissimo poeta’ as Virgil: his shade ‘departed’ Limbo in Canto II, summoned by Beatrice to fetch Dante, and is now recognized as ‘returning’ — a two-canto absence quietly closed by an anonymous voice. [Model knowledge · high]

82. Poi che la voce fu restata e queta,83. vidi quattro grand’ombre a noi venire:84. sembianz’avevan né trista né lieta.

vocabulary: Line 84 — ‘sembianz’avevan né trista né lieta’ — their bearing was neither sad nor glad. A description that matches Limbo’s larger emotional register — ‘duol sanza martìri,’ sorrow without torments — extended here to a settled, affectless dignity rather than either grief or joy. [Model knowledge · medium]

85. Lo buon maestro cominciò a dire:86. «Mira colui con quella spada in mano,87. che vien dinanzi ai tre sì come sire:

cultural ref: Line 86 — ‘con quella spada in mano’ — with that sword in hand. Homer’s attribute is conventional in medieval iconography, marking epic’s martial subject matter; Dante had no direct access to Homer’s Greek text and knew him only through Latin citation and reputation, making the sword an inherited emblem rather than a response to any text Dante had read. [Model knowledge · medium]

88. quelli è Omero poeta sovrano;89. l’altro è Orazio satiro che vene;90. Ovidio è ‘l terzo, e l’ultimo Lucano.

cultural ref: Line 89 — ‘Orazio satiro’ — Horace the satirist. Dante’s label narrows Horace to a single genre, satire, though the historical Horace also wrote odes and epistles — a compression typical of the medieval accessus tradition, which tended to fix each classical author to one defining genre. [Model knowledge · medium]

91. Però che ciascun meco si convene92. nel nome che sonò la voce sola,93. fannomi onore, e di ciò fanno bene».

literary key: Line 92 — ‘nel nome che sonò la voce sola’ — in the name the single voice sounded: ‘poeta.’ Virgil grounds the four poets’ welcome in a shared title rather than personal acquaintance — honoring him is honoring what they all, collectively, are. [Model knowledge · medium]

94. Così vid’i’ adunar la bella scola95. di quel segnor de l’altissimo canto96. che sovra li altri com’aquila vola.

literary key: Line 96 — ‘che sovra li altri com’aquila vola’ — who flies above the rest like an eagle. Dante subordinates Virgil, Horace, Ovid, and Lucan to Homer’s primacy in a single image, even though Homer never speaks a word anywhere in the poem — his authority is entirely reported, never demonstrated on the page. [Model knowledge · medium]

97. Da ch’ebber ragionato insieme alquanto,98. volsersi a me con salutevol cenno,99. e ‘l mio maestro sorrise di tanto;

literary key: Line 97 — ‘ragionato insieme alquanto’ — conversed together for a while. The content of this conversation, held among the five poets before they turn to Dante, is never reported — the poem withholds exactly the exchange a reader might expect to justify what happens next. [Model knowledge · medium]

100. e più d’onore ancora assai mi fenno,101. ch’e’ sì mi fecer de la loro schiera,102. sì ch’io fui sesto tra cotanto senno.

literary key: Line 102 — ‘sì ch’io fui sesto tra cotanto senno’ — so that I was sixth among such great wisdom. One of the most discussed single lines in the Commedia: Dante’s own claim to stand among Homer, Virgil, Horace, Ovid, and Lucan, made with no demonstration of merit on the page and no other witness in the poem to confirm it. [Model knowledge · high]

literary key: Line 100 — ‘e più d’onore ancora assai mi fenno’ — and they did me still greater honor yet. The claim contrasts sharply with Dante-pilgrim’s protest two cantos earlier, ‘Io non Enëa, io non Paulo sono’ (Inf. II.32) — I am not Aeneas, I am not Paul — a refusal of comparison the poem has, by this point, quietly reversed. [Model knowledge · medium]

103. Così andammo infino a la lumera,104. parlando cose che ‘l tacere è bello,105. sì com’era ‘l parlar colà dov’era.

translation note: Line 104 — ‘parlando cose che ‘l tacere è bello’ — speaking of things it is fitting to keep silent. The scene ends by explicitly withholding its own content a second time: first the pre-induction conversation (97), now this conversation on the way to the light, both closed off from the reader. [Model knowledge · medium]

vocabulary: Line 103 — ‘la lumera’ — the light. The fire glimpsed at a distance in the scene’s opening tercet (68–69) is now the traveling company’s destination, setting up the noble castle it illuminates for the scene that follows. [Model knowledge · medium]

The Audacity Reading

This is one of the boldest self-canonizing gestures in the Western tradition: Dante-the-poet, writing years after the pilgrimage he narrates, places his own persona among Homer — a poet he had never read directly, knowing him only by reputation and Latin citation — and the three great Roman poets, on the authority of a private scene no other figure in the poem corroborates. The claim is audacious precisely because it is self-authored and unfalsifiable: the reader has only the poet’s word that the induction happened at all.

Key passage: Inf. IV.100–102 — ‘e più d’onore ancora assai mi fenno, / ch’e’ sì mi fecer de la loro schiera, / sì ch’io fui sesto tra cotanto senno’ — narrated entirely in Dante’s own first-person voice, with no humility formula softening the claim, in sharp contrast to his vigorous refusal of comparison to Aeneas and Paul two cantos earlier (‘Io non Enëa, io non Paulo sono,’ II.32).

The Earned Claim Reading

The scene’s audacity is deliberate and the poem spends its remaining ninety-six cantos justifying it: this is a programmatic announcement, staged as narrative rather than declared as a proem-style boast, that vernacular poetry now has standing beside classical epic. Read against Canto II’s refusal of comparison, the progression from ‘I am not Aeneas, I am not Paul’ to quiet acceptance two cantos later is a sequence Dante constructs on purpose — humility first, honor received rather than claimed, second — making the induction a considered thesis statement about the Comedy’s ambitions rather than simple self-flattery.

Key passage: The structural contrast between Inf. II.10–32, where Dante-pilgrim actively rejects the comparison Virgil offers him, and Inf. IV.100–102, where the honor is conferred by others without Dante requesting or resisting it — a shift the poem builds across two full cantos rather than asserting in a single line.

On the page: The induction occurs entirely off-page: line 97 reports only that they ‘ragionato insieme alquanto’ (conversed together for a while) before the honor is conferred; no content of that conversation, no test, and no citation of Dante’s own poetry appears anywhere in lines 64–105. The claim to inclusion is made in the first-person retrospective voice of the poet-narrator, describing an event with no other textual witness inside the poem to confirm it independently.

What scholars dispute: Whether the absence of any demonstrated merit makes ‘sesto’ a self-authored, unverifiable claim, or whether that same absence is the point — an honor too complete to require staged proof — is not resolved by the text and is argued in both directions across the commentary tradition.

The poem grants the honor with no trial and no cited verse, and never tells us what the four poets discussed before including him. Whether that silence is evasion — a claim that couldn’t survive being tested on the page — or confidence — an honor secure enough not to need demonstrating — is a question the text poses and declines to answer, leaving it to the ninety-six cantos that follow to argue the case implicitly.

The Open Question

When the four great classical poets make room for Dante as ‘sesto tra cotanto senno’ — sixth among such great wisdom — with no test, no verse of his read aloud, no demonstration of merit on the page, is this one of literature’s boldest acts of self-coronation, or a deliberate, earned claim about what the vernacular Comedy is doing to the tradition of epic, staged through action rather than assertion?

Explore More

• 150 Years of Translating the Inferno
• About Reading Dante