The hill is visible, and for a moment the path seems clear. Then the beasts appear. A spotted cat — the lonza, whose Italian name has no certain English equivalent — blocks the way first. A lion follows. The she-wolf comes last and is the worst: she fills Dante with such dread that he loses all hope of the ascent and retreats toward the dark. A few lines later Virgil appears. The three animals that stop the climb have been generating scholarly debate ever since, and the greyhound promised in lines 100–111 to drive the she-wolf back to Hell has never been satisfactorily identified.
Inferno · Canto 1 · Lines 31–60 · Scene 2
Three beasts interrupt Dante’s ascent in sequence, each worse than the last. A leopard — spotted, quick, unwilling to clear the path — appears first but does not stop him entirely; the time of day and the season sustain a measure of hope. A lion follows, head raised, advancing with such force that the air itself seems to shake. Then a she-wolf: gaunt, yet projecting an impression of insatiable accumulation, as though want itself had taken form. It is she who ends the climb. The lonza blocks, the lion menaces, but the she-wolf drives him back step by step until the dark wood he had left is beneath him again, and the sunlit slope is out of reach.
The Italian — The Three Beasts
Source: Wikisource (public domain, pre-1929 text)
Lines 31–33
31. Ed ecco, quasi al cominciar de l’erta,32. una lonza leggera e presta molto,33. che di pel macolato era coverta;
translation note: Line 31 — ‘quasi al cominciar de l’erta’ — almost at the beginning of the ascent. The beast appears the instant Dante starts to climb. The obstacle is inseparable from the attempt: hope generates the encounter. [Model knowledge · high]
wordplay: Line 32 — ‘lonza leggera e presta’ — light and quick. The word lonza is rare in Italian and its zoological referent is uncertain: leopard, lynx, and cheetah have all been proposed. Dante’s lonza is defined by movement and evasion — harder to name than to feel. [Model knowledge · medium]
Lines 34–36
34. e non mi si partia dinanzi al volto,35. anzi ‘mpediva tanto il mio cammino,36. che i’ fui per ritornar più volte vòlto.
translation note: Line 34 — ‘non mi si partia dinanzi al volto’ — it would not leave from before my face. The lonza does not attack; it circles and persists. This is obstruction through distraction, not assault. Incontinence takes the form of an endlessly renewed temptation rather than a single catastrophic blow. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 37–39
37. Temp’ era dal principio del mattino,38. e ‘l sol montava ‘n sù con quelle stelle39. ch’eran con lui quando l’amor divino
theology: Line 37 — Dawn and the spring stars of the vernal equinox: in medieval cosmology, the sun in Aries at equinox was the configuration of the first Creation. Dante situates his journey at a cosmological renewal — a narrative window of grace that the she-wolf will close. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 40–42
40. mosse di prima quelle cose belle;41. sì ch’a bene sperar m’era cagione42. di quella fiera a la gaetta pelle
wordplay: Line 42 — ‘a la gaetta pelle’ — with the bright, gay-colored pelt. The lonza’s spotted coat is described as beautiful in this moment of hope. The same animal that blocks the path is also aesthetically striking — a detail the allegorical reading tends to pass over, but the poem doesn’t. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 43–45
43. l’ora del tempo e la dolce stagione;44. ma non sì che paura non mi desse45. la vista che m’apparve d’un leone.
translation note: Line 44 — ‘ma non sì che’ — but not so much that. The adversative is precise: the hopeful signs were real but insufficient. Dante measures the emotional arithmetic: a dawn, a spring, a creation-moment — not enough against a lion. The poem tracks degrees of hope as if charting a temperature. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 46–48
46. Questi parea che contra me venisse47. con la test’ alta e con rabbiosa fame,48. sì che parea che l’aere ne tremesse.
translation note: Line 47 — ‘con la test’ alta’ — with his head held high. In medieval iconography the raised head is the posture of superbia (pride). The lion does not circle or evade; he comes straight on, arrogant and hungry. His approach is direct where the lonza’s was lateral. [Model knowledge · high]
translation note: Line 48 — ‘che l’aere ne tremesse’ — so that the air seemed to tremble from it. The lion’s menace extends into the atmosphere. This is the only moment in the scene where the physical world registers the beast’s presence beyond what Dante sees — a suggestion of the lion’s scale of threat. [Model knowledge · medium]
Lines 49–51
49. Ed una lupa, che di tutte brame50. sembiava carca ne la sua magrezza,51. e molte genti fé già viver grame,
wordplay: Line 49 — ‘di tutte brame’ — of all cravings, every longing. Not one specific appetite but the universal form of want. The she-wolf doesn’t desire one thing; she embodies desire as a condition. This is what elevates her above the lonza and leone: she represents the structure of insatiability itself. [Model knowledge · high]
translation note: Line 50 — ‘carca ne la sua magrezza’ — laden in her leanness. A deliberate paradox: full of cravings, yet thin. The wanting consumes without satisfying. This oxymoron is Dante’s sharpest image of the insatiability that makes the she-wolf the most dangerous of the three. [Model knowledge · high]
translation note: Line 51 — ‘molte genti fé già viver grame’ — she has made many nations live in grief. Not one man but many nations. The she-wolf’s hunger is collective and historical, distinguishing her damage from the other two beasts. This line is the hinge of the political reading. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 52–54
52. questa mi porse tanto di gravezza53. con la paura ch’uscia di sua vista,54. che io perdei la speranza de l’altezza.
translation note: Line 54 — ‘io perdei la speranza de l’altezza’ — I lost hope of the height. Not ‘the hill was taken from me’ but ‘I lost hope of it.’ The she-wolf’s defeat is psychological before it is physical — she extinguishes the will to climb rather than physically blocking the road. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 55–57
55. E qual è quei che volontieri acquista,56. e giugne ‘l tempo che perder lo face,57. che ‘n tutt’ i suoi pensier piange e s’attrista;
cultural ref: Line 55 — The merchant simile: a man who loves to acquire wealth, then reaches the moment he must lose it all, and weeps in all his thoughts. Dante compares himself to a ruined investor. The she-wolf’s insatiability is likened to financial ruin — not random misfortune but the collapse of something built on the wrong foundation. [Model knowledge · high]
Lines 58–60
58. tal mi fece la bestia sanza pace,59. che, venendomi ‘ncontro, a poco a poco60. mi ripigneva là dove ‘l sol tace.
wordplay: Line 58 — ‘la bestia sanza pace’ — the beast without peace. The she-wolf cannot rest, cannot be satisfied. Restlessness itself will recur as a condition of damnation — the she-wolf’s ‘sanza pace’ anticipates the ceaseless wind that drives Francesca and the other lustful in Inferno V, even though the poem doesn’t repeat the phrase verbatim there. Insatiability is itself a form of Hell — present tense, before the journey even begins. [Model knowledge · medium]
translation note: Line 60 — ‘là dove ‘l sol tace’ — to where the sun is silent. Silence assigned to light. Not darkness but a hush — the dark wood is a place where even illumination has stopped speaking. The scene ends exactly where the poem began: the silent wood, the no-exit. [Model knowledge · high]
Seven Centuries of Reading The Three Beasts
The Aristotelian Map: Early Commentary
The earliest readers brought Aristotle to the beasts. Pietro Alighieri, working from the Nicomachean Ethics, mapped the three animals onto Aristotle’s types of moral vice: incontinence (the lonza), violence (the lion), and fraud or malice (the she-wolf). Benvenuto da Imola developed this through Aquinas, placing each beast in a scholastic ethical taxonomy. The Ottimo Commento agreed on the essentials. Boccaccio made an addition: he noted the she-wolf’s internal paradox — ‘laden with cravings, lean with insatiability’ — and saw Augustine behind Dante’s cupiditas, the appetite that consumes without satisfying. These readings shared an assumption: the three beasts were diagrams of human vice, and identifying the diagram was the task.
The Veltro and the Problem of the Prophecy
This early consensus broke almost immediately on the Veltro. Lines 100–111 promise a greyhound who will drive the she-wolf back to Hell — ‘born between feltro and feltro,’ living on wisdom, love, and virtue rather than land or money. Medieval commentators could not resist the question: who is it? Pietro proposed Cangrande della Scala, Dante’s patron. Later fourteenth-century readers proposed Henry VII. Others saw a coming pope, a spiritual reformer, a civic leader who never arrived. The prophecy is precisely vague enough to sustain any of these identifications — and precisely vague enough to outlast all of them. No candidate has ever achieved consensus.
De Sanctis and the Political Reading
Francesco De Sanctis gave the she-wolf her most powerful political reading. Writing in the 1860s, De Sanctis argued that the three beasts named Italy’s real enemies: the she-wolf as the corrupted papacy, the lion as the French crown, the lonza as an unstable, faction-ridden Florence. The Veltro became the promised national restorer who would purge these forces. De Sanctis shaped Italian Dante scholarship for a generation, and his reading still echoes in commentary that treats the three beasts as a diagnosis of collective rather than individual failure.
Twentieth-Century Scholarship: Allegory Under Pressure
Charles Singleton pressed the moral allegorical case with rigor, insisting the beasts are Dante’s spiritual obstacles as much as Italy’s political ones, and that the resolution comes through Beatrice’s intercession rather than political reform. Teodolinda Barolini questioned whether the animals submit to any single allegorical frame at all. She argued that the poem generates the effect of coherence while maintaining structural ambiguity: the she-wolf is not simply avarice or the papacy but a figure of insatiable desire that the poem refuses to fully anchor to a referent.
The Veltro remains unidentified. Contemporary scholarship, including the Digital Dante project at Columbia, preserves all the historical candidates without endorsing any. What remains contested is a more fundamental question: whether the three beasts are an allegory to be decoded or an experience to be undergone. Dante says the she-wolf ‘made him lose hope of the height.’ That psychological register — not the symbolic one — may be the passage’s primary claim.
The Two Main Positions on The Three Beasts
Allegorical / Thomistic
The three beasts map onto the three categories of sin that structure Inferno’s moral geography: the lonza to incontinence (the lightest sins, uppermost in Hell), the lion to violence (the middle), the she-wolf to fraud and malice (the deepest). This reading, established by Pietro Alighieri and Benvenuto da Imola, grounds the beasts in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics as Dante received it through Aquinas. The she-wolf as avarice fits Augustine’s framing of cupiditas as the root of all disordered love.
Key passage: Inf. XI.82–83 — Virgil’s own classification of Hell’s sins into incontinence, violence, and fraud, in language that maps onto the three beasts
Political / Historical
The beasts name the political forces Dante saw destroying Italy: the lonza as Florence (the city’s symbol was a lion, but its politics were spotted and shifting), the lion as the French Crown (Charles of Valois had just ravaged Florence), the she-wolf as the papacy under Boniface VIII — insatiable for temporal power, corrupting every city she touches. This reading, central to De Sanctis and extended by twentieth-century historians, treats the Comedy as a political diagnosis delivered in the language of allegory.
Key passage: Inf. I.51 — ‘molte genti fé già viver grame’ (many nations made to live in grief) — civic, not merely personal, scale of damage
What the Text Does — and What That Means (Contested)
On the page: Dante gives each beast a distinct mode of obstruction: the lonza circles and delays without attacking; the lion approaches frontally with raised head; the she-wolf pushes Dante back incrementally (‘a poco a poco’). The she-wolf receives the most elaborate description, the most consequences, and the only prophecy in the scene. Dante never names the allegorical content of the beasts in the poem itself.
What scholars dispute: The allegorical assignments (lonza = lust, leone = pride, lupa = avarice, or alternately political entities) originate with medieval commentators, not with Dante’s text. Whether the poem endorses any single scheme — or strategically activates multiple readings — is among the most debated questions in Dante scholarship. The she-wolf is the crux: her scale of damage (‘many nations’) and the unresolved Veltro prophecy resist containment in any one-to-one allegory.
What Dante Leaves Unresolved
The Veltro (lines 100–111) — the greyhound who will come to drive the she-wolf back to Hell — has defied seven centuries of identification. Pietro Alighieri proposed Cangrande della Scala; others proposed Henry VII, a reformed papacy, a future emperor, or a purely spiritual redeemer. The prophecy is specific enough to feel historical (‘born between feltro and feltro’) yet vague enough to resist all anchoring. Whether Dante intended a real contemporary figure or knew that the savior was, at the time of writing, only a hope — is one of the questions the poem refuses to answer.
The Open Question
Dante names three animals without naming what they mean. The earliest readers assigned each beast a sin; later readers assigned each a political enemy. The she-wolf has been read as avarice, as the papacy, as the French court, as the appetite for power, and as the general condition of insatiability. Can a single image hold all of these at once — or does the poem choose, and refuse to say?
Explore More
